Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over


The Commodity Trading Forum is a presentation of		Free Commodity Chart Service

Trader's Forum

Advertising Info.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Commodity Trading Discussion Forum

Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over

Posted By: trend
Date: Friday, 3 July 2009, at 10:16 p.m.

In Response To: Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over *PIC* (Maneca)

I don't really use the head and shoulders pattern per say, but I did short at your H and your RS because of lower volume, among other things. When you have lower volume on a higher high you at least know, smart money ain't buying. But, it takes the whole method to get the signals. Volume is a part of it.
I use RW's theories in my programming on volume.

If you want to print this message, you might have better results, and waste less paper if you print this printer friendly page.

Messages In This Thread

S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over *PIC* (views:165)
Trades -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 11:55 a.m.
- Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over *PIC* (views:119)
  Maneca -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 5:53 p.m.
  - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over/Maneca (views:102)
    Trades -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 7:25 p.m.
    - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over/Maneca (views:77)
      bill ward -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 12:58 a.m.
      - Re: S&P/DX/bill ward *PIC* (views:116)
        Trades -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 2:33 a.m.
  - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over (views:59)
    trend -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 10:16 p.m.
    - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over (views:77)
      trend -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 10:33 p.m.
  - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over (views:95)
    trend -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 9:46 a.m.
    - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over (views:107)
      Maneca -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 5:29 p.m.
      - Re: S&P/Using a 34ema/50ema Cross Over (views:80)
        trend -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 6:23 p.m.
      - correction: "for Tuesday" should be "for Monday" (views:106)
        Maneca -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 6:08 a.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be "for Monda (views:71)
        trend -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 11:00 a.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be "for Monda (views:88)
        Spike -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 11:41 a.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be.../ Spike (views:93)
        Maneca -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 3:21 a.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be.../ Spike (views:78)
        Doc -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 9:03 a.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be.../ NTR (views:55)
        Spike -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 7:12 p.m.
        
        Re: correction: "for Tuesday" should be.../ NTR (views:54)
        Spike -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 7:10 p.m.

Post Response

Your Name:
E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:
If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message, please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
If you'd like to have the option of deleting your post later, please provide a password (CASE SENSITIVE!):
Password:
Save Password:	Yes No

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Commodity Trading Discussion Forum is maintained by Mike Ritchie with WebBBS 5.00.

To report abuse of this Forum, please send email to: admin1@tradingcharts.com