Of course not.
Haven't you heard? It is not global warming. It is "Global Climate Change".
Science used to deal with theory's proof. If any portion of one's data, or analysis was incorrect, it made the entire "theory" invalid. Of course, that theory could be true, but it needed to be re-evaluated, viz-a-viz pure data and analysis of "pure" data.
Albert, Jr., likes "science by consensus", such as the "jury is in".
Falsification of, and withholding of data, has no bearing.
Follow the money. Even "Big Oil" has funded, into the multi-billions, "global warmers".
Their funding to those that stand agains man-made "climate change" is in the LOW millions.
Follow the money.