You did make a good point about the use of those terms in the headline. The articles themselves are balanced but I see your point. I will remove them.

My education service is an open book. I demonstrate short-term trading tactics in live markets and that is free. Everything I do is in live markets in front of the students -- it's up to them if they want to attend and/or study the online courses.

I encourage clients to stay in the demo account for years if that is what it takes. And I certainly wouldn't breach the privacy of a student/client under any circumstances.

I do see that Elliott is viable on the lower time frames, particularly when viewed through the mechanical framework of RTT Theory, but as I said in the article it loses it's continuity quickly over time, or when new information is introduced into the market-- like most pattern recognition tactics. The bottom line is recognizing when we are in a favorable environment -- time to trade --and when we are not -- do not trade.

You can come and see a live demonstration for yourself tomorrow morning, it is free, and there certainly is no commitment -- I'm sure I've invited you before. I do understand however that most people who want to be traders are also of the mindset that they want to do it their way -- that's the lure in the first place. It's hard for them to learn from someone they perceive as different than them, impossible in fact, without trust.

Trading involves risk of loss and is not suitable for most investors.