Look...the climate changes...it has changed since there was a "climate". Ice ages, warming periods, "normality"(whatever that is).
This is the end of the discussion about anthropogenic climate change. Anthropogenic means human influenced...man made, if you will.
Here comes the word from NOAA: "it was announced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that there has been no U.S. warming since 2005."
Their method: "In January 2005, NOAA began recording temperatures at its newly built U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN). USCRN includes 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states. NOAA selected locations that were far away from urban and land-development impacts that might artificially taint temperature readings…"
Well, how were they doing it before?:"Many of the U.S. stations were in locations such as paved driveways, near rooftop exhaust vents, even near idling jet engines."
So, You mean they weren't doing it this way before? No.:"All of the asserted U.S. warming since 1930 is the product of the controversial adjustments made to the raw data."
Adjustments to the raw data? You mean they took the raw data and made it say what they wanted it to say? Yes.:"All of the asserted U.S. warming since 1930 is the product of the controversial adjustments made to the raw data."
So, what did the raw data reveal before it was jacked with by liberal morons?:"There is also good reason to believe U.S. temperatures have not warmed at all since the 1930s. Raw temperature readings at the preexisting stations indicate temperatures are the same now as 80 years ago."
How heavily did Mann rely on data not adjusted to say what he wanted it to say or any data at all? Well, none.:"In 2016, Mann testified before the Democratic Platform Drafting Committee that actual data didn’t really matter because we could actually see climate change happening." Saying this:"Leading climate doomsayer Michael Mann recently downplayed the importance of climate change science, telling Democrats that data and models “increasingly are unnecessary” because the impact is obvious…"
This is the biggest bullchit scam ever peritrated on the world. It became apparent to me that it was a scam because, well, in the 60 years I've been alive...the climate appears to me to be the same as it always was since I was born. The biggest indicator to me, though, was that the solution to the supposed problem was always the same...implementation of the communist manifesto. Give us all your money, liberties, freedoms, and live under godvernment dictates.
This has even been stated by some of the perpetrators of the hoax, such as, Occasional cortex's, campaign manager and author of her New Green Deal plan.:Chakrabarti had an unexpected disclosure. “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal,” he said, “is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all.” Ricketts greeted this startling notion with an attentive poker face. “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Chakrabarti continued. “Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/07/12/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-green-new-deal-about-implementing-socialism-it-wasnt-originally-a-climate-thing-at-all-its-a-change-the-entire-economy-thing/
deny that...cultist of communism.